Mar 31 2008
Does Censorship Have a Place?

I am a huge fan of Judy Blume’s work; I think I made that clear in my recent blog, Wanted: Creative Ways to Engage America’s Youth in Reading. I don’t remember the first time I learned that her books had fallen victim to censorship where, in some cases, they were placed on restricted shelves in libraries and, in others, they were banned altogether, but I was appalled.
Many of her books deal with topics that I was interested in as a teenager ranging from menstruation and masturbation to death and sex. However, it was precisely these themes that caused the censors to get their panties in a bunch.
In the introduction of Places I Never Meant to Be, Ms. Blume cites examples of censorship in relation to her books and those of other authors. The cases range from “the mother who admitted she’d cut two pages out of Then Again, Maybe I Won’t rather than allow her almost thirteen-year-old son to read about wet dreams,” to Florida, junior high school teacher Gloria Pipkin who faced censorship of books such as To Kill A Mockingbird and The Great Gatsby, among others, and “fought a five-year battle, jeopardizing her job and personal safety (she and the reporter covering the story received death threats) to help reinstate books.”
When she completed Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret, Ms. Blume gave copies to her children’s school. However, she writes “…the books never reached the shelves. The male principal decided on his own that they were inappropriate for elementary school readers because of the discussion of menstruation (never mind how many fifth – and sixth – grade girls already had their periods.)”
Does censorship serve any purpose? Is it just wrong? Or is it good for works to be censored? Does it make them more intriguing and thereby, more sought after or does it seriously limit the potential reach of the works?
I vividly remember reading Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret and although some of the menstruation techniques were out-dated, the book made me feel a sense of connection that went beyond my menstruation curiosity. I was simply elated that there was someone out there who finally understood what it meant to be a teenage girl and wasn’t afraid to talk frankly about it.
What if all the authors you loved were suddenly banned? What would you do?
Censorship limits art, creativity and growth. It is angel of death to ideas. Don’t get me wrong, there have been radio reporter comments, artwork, books, magazine articles, newspaper op-eds and more that I have objected to because I did not agree with the opinions put forth. I may have even uttered the sentence, “That person shouldn’t be allowed to spew that crap.” I’ve worried about the impact of words or images, especially those of hate, on people, particularly on young people, but I can honestly say that I’ve still never agreed with censorship.
Our country was founded on the belief that we should be free to speak our mind although the recent climate in America hasn’t always fostered or upheld that idea. This is apparent in the media where key pieces of information have been edited from our news coverage or in cases where people lost jobs over comments made when their behavior warranted discussion and serious debate prior to such action. These factors have contributed to the rise in popularity of blogging and other forms of Internet communication.
To my mind, we are a society at-risk of losing basic conversational and valuable debate skills. So often there is a jump to the extreme – censorship – instead of a questioning and debating of the issues on the page, on the television, on the radio, or on our dinner tables. Differing opinions and controversial issues are cause for inquiry; shouldn’t we be allowed to question? The things that we read, see, and hear that give us pause and invite us to examine our own beliefs help us to grow. Shouldn’t we be encouraging younger generations to engage in questioning and debate of that which stands in opposition to their ideas?
I recently wrote an article for a magazine which will appear later this year and as I wrote it, I was forced to question my understanding of racial issues, including stereotypes, as I scrutinized some of my personal experiences. Without trying to pander to any particular group of people, I struggled to find a way to tell my truth in a manner that would not be considered offensive. As I write this, I stop for a moment to consider whether or not I ever worried that if I did not chose the right word or string of words, I would be edited or censored. However, after much thought, I do not think that entered into my writing process. Instead, I think it had to do with tone. An angry or overly aggressive tone can sometimes turn people off thereby causing them to lose the meat or main message of the piece. I wanted my message and thoughts on the racial tensions and prejudices that I have faced to be heard with open minds and then, hopefully, discussed. Without discussions, without a sharing of opinions we agree with and those that we don’t, those that support us and those that challenge us, we are like plants without water. We won’t grow and eventually we will sink into a rut and slip away.
Whether it is a revolutionary business idea or a new art concept, we need people’s unique takes on life. If we don’t want to hear, see, or read it, we have the freedom to make the choice not to and, if we have young children, we can restrict them from seeing it until we know they are old enough to understand. My daughter in incredibly young so there is much that she may not understand now but when she is older I will share as many works as I can with her, including controversial ones, and it is my hope that at that time we will be able to have discussions where I teach her and she teaches me. I sincerely hope I remain open-minded as I grow older.
If we continue to censor people, we will end up with a society that speaks about nothing of interest. Younger generations will be unable to compete on a global stage as they will lack the ability to comprehend and debate challenging views. Organizations such as the National Coalition Against Censorship are working hard to make sure people’s voices are not silenced. Should we all be helping to do that in our homes, classrooms, board rooms, playgrounds and various other gathering places?
When have you worried about what you said, did or created? Did you overcome it? Do you agree with censorship in any form? Do you think there are certain places where censorship is acceptable? Or do you think it should be unacceptable across the board?





Photo by Natasha Reilly







